In reality, not only are families facing rising healthcare costs, but people of faith are losing their religious liberty due to Obamacare and subsequent court rulings.
Court Battle: Round 1 - The States vs. Obamacare
26 states worked together to overturn Obamacare including; Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Idaho, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Ohio, Wisconsin and Wyoming.
26 states worked together to overturn Obamacare including; Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Idaho, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Ohio, Wisconsin and Wyoming.
Florida vs. the Health and Human Services Department - Obamacare overturned in the District Court
Florida vs. the Health and Human Services Department - Partially upheld in the 11 Circuit Court of Appeals
Florida vs. the Health and Human Services Department - Obamacare Upheld in the Supreme Court
Florida vs. the Health and Human Services Department - Partially upheld in the 11 Circuit Court of Appeals
Florida vs. the Health and Human Services Department - Obamacare Upheld in the Supreme Court
Court Battle: Round 2 - Religious Organizations & Businesses vs. Obamacare
“Now our faith is being challenged by the federal government. The Health and Human Services ‘preventative services’ mandate forces businesses to provide the ‘morning-after’ and the ‘week-after’ pills in our health insurance plans. These abortion-causing drugs go against our faith, and our family is now being forced to choose between following the laws of the land that we love or maintaining the religious beliefs that have made our business successful and have supported our family and thousands of our employees and their families. We simply cannot abandon our religious beliefs to comply with this mandate.” -Green Family owners of Hobby Lobby
“Now our faith is being challenged by the federal government. The Health and Human Services ‘preventative services’ mandate forces businesses to provide the ‘morning-after’ and the ‘week-after’ pills in our health insurance plans. These abortion-causing drugs go against our faith, and our family is now being forced to choose between following the laws of the land that we love or maintaining the religious beliefs that have made our business successful and have supported our family and thousands of our employees and their families. We simply cannot abandon our religious beliefs to comply with this mandate.” -Green Family owners of Hobby Lobby
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. vs. Sebelius - District Court Denies Hobby Lobby's request for an Injunction aganist ObamaCare
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. vs. Sebelius - Sotomayor denies Hobby Lobby's request for an Injuction against ObamaCare
Hobby Lobby wins Preliminary Injunction
Obama Administration's Appeal to the Supreme Court
Hobby Lobby Wins!
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. vs. Sebelius - Sotomayor denies Hobby Lobby's request for an Injuction against ObamaCare
Hobby Lobby wins Preliminary Injunction
Obama Administration's Appeal to the Supreme Court
Hobby Lobby Wins!
Court Battle: Round 3 - Taxpayers vs. Obamacare
This case questioned the ability of individuals who are insured by non-State run exchanges to receive Federal Subsidies. The basis for the suit is the statement that an individual does qualify for a subsidy unless they are, “enrolled in through an Exchange established by the State under [§] 1311 of the [ACA],” with State clarified to be one of the 50 States or the District of Columbia.
This case questioned the ability of individuals who are insured by non-State run exchanges to receive Federal Subsidies. The basis for the suit is the statement that an individual does qualify for a subsidy unless they are, “enrolled in through an Exchange established by the State under [§] 1311 of the [ACA],” with State clarified to be one of the 50 States or the District of Columbia.
King vs. Burwell - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals - Finds that Congressional Intent is not what the law clearly states.
King vs. Burwell - Supreme Court of the United States - upholds the Fourth Circuit ruling 6-3 with Scalia, Alito, and Thomas dissenting.
For all the Supreme Court briefs in this case click here.
King v. Burwell versus Marbury v. Madison - thefederalist.com
King vs. Burwell - Supreme Court of the United States - upholds the Fourth Circuit ruling 6-3 with Scalia, Alito, and Thomas dissenting.
For all the Supreme Court briefs in this case click here.
King v. Burwell versus Marbury v. Madison - thefederalist.com
Fact Sheets
